kant on the "a priori" toward an interpretation

the a priori is the basic characteristic ofkant's theory of knowledge. formaliz/ng the a priori, kant appears to distinguish the a priorifrom the postriori and qffirms its purity. he insists that the a priori is prior to the a postriori and stqys independent!jfrom it. the overall objectiue of this paper is, boueier; to present and to support this idea that the a priori, even prior, can be defined l?j its relation to experience; ifthe a priori is prior to the a postriori, and ifits validity is not depended on the a postriori, it is still not ivithout mry relation with it. the main thesis i u;iflfoll01v here is that the a postriori could be called the root of the a priori: the a priori has its principle in the a postriorijust because it is given to it. the a priori is given in the experience. instead of conceiving the a priori as a formal or logical cond ition of ol?jectiviry, it uould be considered as immanent in the objea and apprehended during the very act of experience, although known implicit!j before experience occurs. if the a priori is indeed given in experience, we are not constrained to restrict it to the formal conditions of oijectiviry. however, before proceeding to substantiate this thesis, i 1vill reiien. kant's analysis of the a priori quick/y. then, i willpresent the main thesis and its proof to deformalize the a priori and implant it in the a postriori domain.